Let’s start with some facts. MAp has a management agreement with Macquarie Group whereby it pays the mothership between 1% and 1.5% of MAp’s market capitalisation. At today’s price, that’s more than $40m per year, plus performance fees.
Now the directors tell us that they can employee Kerrie Mather and her team of 30 – that’s all of Macquarie’s airports expertise – for approximately $11.5m a year. All we need to do is get 50% of the outstanding securities in favour of a deal to sack Macquarie, we employ Mather and team and put $30m per year straight in the Johnny rocket. Tell me, please, where do I sign?
Hold on a moment, Bristlemouth, the directors tell us. Ah, that’s not really in securityholders’ best interests. We think you are better off paying Macquarie $340m in securities to ‘internalise’ the management of MAp. You see, if you just sack them, well, maybe the management team won’t come across.
Really? Surely you could get an office and a few computers for $500k a year, which leaves $11m in salaries with which to pay our 30 staff. They must know something about the investment banking job market that I don’t if an average of $330k each isn’t enough. Jobless investment bankers are a dime a dozen and, to be honest, monitoring a portfolio of airport investments is hardly the world’s most difficult job.
But apparently there’s an even bigger reason to hand Macquarie 6.3% of the group. Sacking Macquarie, we’re told, will trigger ‘change-of-control provisions’. It seems that Macquarie has a poison pill with which it, or the banks financing the underlying airports, can ‘blow up Macquarie Airports’ in the words of Malcolm Maiden in Saturday’s Sydney Morning Herald.
Perhaps that’s true. We’ve never been given access to the full management agreement between the two entities. But is Macquarie really going to destroy the value of a fund in which it has a billion dollars of its own money invested?
The reputational issues would be severe enough. But the financial implications make for a ludicrous line of argument.
I can’t see one good reason to pay Macquarie this extortionate amount of money. Securityholders should vote against the proposal and immediately put a new one forward: internalise the management, but internalise it for free.
Functional cookies Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.