Coffey International (COF) executive directors John Douglas and Urs Meyerhans might have managed to tip themselves a little extra bonus from the takeover offer by Tetra Tech.
Filings with the ASX yesterday show that chief executive officer Douglas acquired 2.8m shares, and chief financial officer Meyerhans 1.4m, through an incentive grant. The cost of the shares, still held within a trust and still subject to vesting conditions, was based on the average traded price in the five trading days up to 30 June 2015, which, you guessed it, was before the takeover.
Shareholders approved these incentive grants at the annual general meeting on 15 October, just one day after the takeover was announced, meaning shareholders would have overwhelmingly voted prior to knowing about the takeover offer.
In the event of a takeover the board basically has discretion as to whether the shares vest. Experience tells me the board, tickled pink with the takeover, will probably allow it. The cost of these shares to Douglas and Meyerhans is $0.14, compared to the current share price of $0.41, which would mean a net gain of $756,000 and $387,000 respectively. That’s a nice Christmas bonus.
Now I’m thankful for the takeover offer. And the cost of these share issues will most likely be borne by the acquirer Tetra Tech, rather than current shareholders, assuming the offer goes through. So it’s not really our problem. But they are supposed to be long term incentives as part of the remuneration package for the 2016 financial year. There’s every chance these two directors will be cashing out in full halfway through a year they only work half of.
Meanwhile shareholders have suffered a 50% loss since Douglas took office in 2011.
Forager Funds will be holding a presentation in both Sydney and Melbourne during November – to find out more and to register, please visit the links below:
2 thoughts on “Coffey Directors Tip Themselves”
Nice one Matt. My first reaction was ‘Tetra Tech are paying for this anyway’. Thinking it through, though, Tetra Tech would have been well aware of the giveaway and would have budgeted for it. They could have paid an additional 0.5 cents per share to all shareholders if they didn’t pay out on this bonus. I wonder if they were initially prepared to pay 43 cents but had to give it a haircut to pay for this giveaway? In a way, you might be paying for it.
Mr Douglas and Mr Meyerhans what have you to say for yourselves?