Because Australian city house prices are again heating up, articles mentioning a housing bubble are once again reaching fever pitch from both the yay and nay side. Apologies in advance for adding to the tally.
I don’t know whether Australian house prices are in a bubble, whether they’re irrationally exuberant or merely overpriced, it won’t change my approach to the sector – by which I intend to avoid it as much as possible, avoid the banks, avoid what might be economically linked to the housing sector, and own some assets outside the country. I’m on the bearish side and don’t wish to get caught up in disputes on how to categorise the matter. For what it’s worth, I agree with Steve Johnson in our latest quarterly letter (out soon) that the word ‘bubble’ gets thrown around too often these days, and accept I’ve been a part of the problem. I also agree with colleague Richard Livingston that it’s debt, rather than property values, that is the chief concern.
In short, the articles report someone important and influential within the RBA or one of the big four banks telling us all that there is no housing bubble. There may be one day, but there isn’t just yet. The generally unwritten subtext is that this sort of expert advice should sooth your concerns, don’t stress. Hey, these experts may very well be right, they surely know the property market better than I do.
But, as is often the case, a quick inversion reveals the underlying absurdity. Do you think it would be possible to ever have a housing bubble without the RBA and the big four banks being ignorant to the fact? To me, the answer is a clear no.
We’re not rich enough to be able to have a property bubble without copious amounts of debt. If the RBA thought there was a bubble, rates would go up until it impacted new borrowings. If the big four banks thought there was a bubble, they’d scramble to protect their balance sheets by tightening lending requirements and increasing lending margins (and rates), or at least move most of the credit risk off their books through securitisation (which we haven’t seen to any great degree).
In fact, one of the first queries that belongs on your ‘Is this a housing bubble?’ checklist is ‘Are the RBA and big four banks ignorant of a potential bubble?’. A yes answer is a prerequisite for an actual bubble to occur.
Whether today’s market is a bubble, or whether we’re heading there, are matters that intelligent people can and do argue over (and over again). But one thing intelligent folk won’t be doing is taking solace from this sort of article or expert.
Functional cookies Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.