Greg Perry and Peter Morgan set the cat amongst the pigeons on the weekend. The two former fund managers – and it’s the ‘former’ that’s important – had the hide to suggest that listed companies providing selective briefings to fund managers creates an uneven playing field.
The current fund managers (a little more to lose, perhaps?) are up in arms. Geoff Wilson is leading the charge, quoted extensively in yesterday’s Financial Review saying there is nothing untoward going on. Equity Trustees’ chief investment officer George Boubouras chimed in saying he had ‘never been given confidential information’ in 20 years of company meetings.
He must be attending different meetings to me. I’ve seen plenty of information disclosed that the average investor doesn’t have access to. And I’ve only been in the job four years.
I’m not suggesting anyone did anything untoward with that information. Of course not. But the potential exists.
For David Paradice, boss of his eponymous $10bn funds management company, access to information that others don’t have (or aren’t looking for) is a key plank in his success. Here’s an extract from an AFR Magazine hagiography a few months back:
Some years ago David Paradice and his mate, fellow fund manager Alex Waislitz, were heading into a meeting with a company in which they were considering investing. Waislitz noticed that the blue suit Paradice was wearing was torn and he could see the white lining. “I said, ‘David, you can’t go in looking like that’. But he said, ‘There’s no way I’m missing this meeting because you might get information that I may not.’ So, quick as a flash, he got out this blue Texta pen and proceeded to scribble over the white patches on his suit pocket so they blended in with the rest of it. And then we went into the meeting.
Waislitz relates the anecdote to make two points about Paradice, or “Para” as he is known. “He’s not an over-spender by any means”, and he is relentless in his pursuit of slivers of information to gain an advantage for investment decisions. [my emphasis]
Again, I'm not suggesting 'Para' is doing anything illegitemate. We’re all in the same game. We’re either looking for information that others don’t have, or interpreting that information differently. But it shouldn’t be coming from the mouth of the CEO. And it shouldn’t be anything that is not publicly available should the average investor choose to look for it.
The solution to this problem is simple. Firstly, webcast all investor briefings so the general public can watch what the CEO has to say and how he or she answers questions. Secondly, if a company has a one-on-one briefing with a fund manager, it should be recorded so that ASIC can inspect the records any time it feels like it.
The cost of those two steps is negligible. They will bring the dubious behaviour to a screaming halt. And we’ll all be playing on the same field.
Functional cookies Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.