Every asset in the world is priced with reference to the bond market, at least in theory. The bond market dictates your risk-free (ok, low risk) opportunity cost. It’s the so-called price signal. Say you’re considering investing in equities or real estate or barrels of oil – these assets entail greater risk than a bond. So don’t bother unless you receive adequate excess return.
The same applies in the creation of new assets. Looking to build a block of flats on former farmland, expand a manufacturing facility or drill a hole in the earth seeking oil? Textbooks say that bond yields should play a part in your calculations.
So government and high quality corporate bond rates have long been important bellwethers. They are the most important price signals in all of finance. But thoroughly rigged is today’s bond market, especially in Europe.
European interest rate market is fixed
A recent email from Grant’s Interest Rate Observer to subscribers gave a timely reminder. It quoted the CEO of Deutsche Bank, John Cryan, from late 2016:
The impact of buying up corporate bonds is that we see, in our bank, bond-trading volumes down something like three-quarters. And there has absolutely been no price discovery now in corporate bonds, so we don’t really know the price of credit, which is a dangerous situation.
That quote is consistent with what I’ve heard. A friend of mine has been a bond salesman for the DACH region (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) for a few decades, tasked with talking to clients and facilitating bids and offers between them and the bank’s traders. He focuses on corporate offerings.
He told me the market has never been so dead, there’s nothing much to do. He’s out the door at 4:30 nearly every afternoon. There is still decent business in primary offers (when a corporate client wants to raise fresh money via a bond) but the secondary market is completely dead.
Why? Because the ECB bond buying program hoovers up everything offered in the secondary market. They’re also buying primary issues in some markets. The ‘tapering’ of that program from €80 million a month to €60 million from April 2017 has made no noticeable difference. They dominate the ‘bid’ and suppress volatility in the process.
Wisdom of the few
The price signal was once the by-product of thousands of individual players making self-interested decisions. There was wisdom in the crowd, if not at all times then at least over time. Today, those prices for the whole of Europe are set largely from inside one building in Frankfurt. What was once somewhat reliable is today as trustworthy as a fox in the hen pen. Completely distorted. By design.
Of course, this fact is well known. The aim of this post is to share a potentially useful anecdote and reminder rather than get into a long treatise on my subjective thoughts on the flaws in modern central banking. Your life is too short and worthwhile. But the market is rigged. And I can’t help but draw one of just a few possible conclusions:
- Market participants are naïve. Central bankers decided that the risks from elevated prices for existing assets are outweighed by the knock on effect of companies and investors adding new capacity and demand, boosting the real economy in the process (ignore, for now, that this hasn’t gone to plan, new equipment and infrastructure investment still runs well below average). Taking cues from the old American saying ‘don’t fight the Fed’, investors are responding by buying lower quality assets than they otherwise would, at higher prices than they otherwise would have to pay, in order to earn returns no longer available in either government or corporate bond markets.
- The ECB is naïve and filled with first order thinkers. It doesn’t realise the market is a complex, adaptive system where players are always trying to second-guess the intentions of other players. The ECB foot on top of the head of interest rates is obvious to all. Players are adequately adjusting for it when they think about risk-free rates in the pricing of riskier assets and creation of new assets.
- A bit of both
Compressed high yield spreads and rising equity and real estate markets in Europe argue strongly for conclusion 1. The complete buyers’ strike in the bond market offers contrast, suggesting conclusion 2. My gut says go with 3.
Buy now, pay later
European investors do appear to be taking on riskier assets because of low bond rates. European first home buyers are buying increasingly richly-priced properties, often with floating rate mortgages. European companies may finally be making some expansion decision using suppressed bond rates in their cost of capital calculations. On some level, they are all being played like violins.
The long term consequences of this manipulation? Your guess is as good as mine. Those central planners, err economists, in Frankfurt clearly have more faith in their own judgement than I do. Somewhere between benign and damaging is my best guess.
6 thoughts on “Draghi’s Poisoned Price Signal”
Your joking Gareth?
A decade long manipulation of interest rates, massive money printing, governments and private citizens with high nett debt and over-valued assets (property and shares), and huge unfunded liabilities of pensions and health care for ageing populations.
There is little possibility of benign.
Something has to break, there will be defaults.
Will it be more bank failures? Tougher lending standards or much higher interest rates? Will governments default on their debts or adjust the social contracts?
It will be messy, but inflation 1970s messy or deflation 1930s messy, or a new messy?
I agree, things should get more “messy” as you say though I think the degree of mess will be constrained collectively by oversight bodies. For instance, in the EU up until now banks have been universally bailed out by their governments and in some instances those governments have then been bailed out by either the EU or IMF or both. We’re now finally seeing equity holders and bond holders being wiped out (a bank in Spain last week & two in Italy over the weekend) where financial institutions cannot pass adequacy hurdles instituted by their regulators & market driven recapitalisations would be unlikely . I think that’s instructive of how the “messy” scenario will play out in future. That said, those banks were comparatively small and it will be interesting to see what happens should a major bank such a Deutsche sink.
When comparing the smarts of different incarnations of Mr Market, there can be little doubt that Mr Bond Market is almost always much shrewder than Mr Equity Market or Mr Real Estate Market.
You shouldn’t be giving their opinions anything even close to equal weights.
I thought what Gareth was saying is that Mr Bond Market is absent. Is there any real market when there are essentially only bureaucrats participating?
Precisely. Mr Bond Market has been drugged and is being held in a basement somewhere while Mr M.I.T.-trained currently holds the baton, nursing delusions he can do a better job conducting the entire orchestra from his office in Frankfurt.
Central planning has not ever been especially effective, why should that change now?
Unfortunately there seems to be some deeply entrenched European scepticism about markets and democracy; as manifest in the we-know-better approach of the elites like the whole EU project (where the EU parliament has little if any power) the ECB and so on.
It takes a special kind of hubris for these conductors of the orchestra to think they can prevent some kind of horrible outcome.
If they pull it off I’ll be the first to fess up to being wrong. I doubt I”ll need to do this, though.