The All Ords index might be up 35% from its low on 6 March 2009, but the opportunities today are as good as they were then.
Firstly, there is substantially more redundancy in the system due to the market recapitalisation of 2009 and 2010. Thanks to $42bn of capital raised in 2008, $67bn in 2009 and conservative dividend payout ratios, the amount of debt carried by our listed companies is significantly more manageable.
Comparing today’s balance sheets for non-bank stocks in the ASX 200 with those of December 2008, the ratio of total debt to total equity has fallen from 82% to 50%. The property trust (or REIT) sector is back to its conservative roots. GPT, for example, carried a debt-to-equity ratio of 87% at the end of 2008. Today it is still a touch too high, but 37% is much more manageable.
Substantially lower debt levels mean most businesses now have the wherewithal to cope with a very serious recession.
Secondly, perhaps more importantly, this time around the great businesses have been smashed too. In 2008/9, it was the highly leveraged and operationally fragile that bore most of the burden. Sure, some of those stocks are up 10-fold since – there were extraordinary bargains on offer – but those profits came with more than their fair share of risk. Most of them were a serious chance of going bust.
The likes of Woolworths, Cochlear and QBE generally held their value. That made the decision about where to put your cash difficult; to get the really cheap stocks you had to slide down the risk curve and into a pool of sleepless nights.
Today some of Australia’s businesses are trading at prices near or below their prices of March 2009. Most have them have substantially increased their franchise value in the two years since.
I’ll stick the one I’m spending lots of time on as an example. In 2008 QBE Insurance collected US$9.3bn of net insurance premiums. This year it expects to write US$14.8bn worth, and will earn a similar underwriting profit of about 10% (in insurance jargon this means a combined operating ratio of 90% – 90% of the premiums are paid out as claims and operating expenses).
Yet the share price is 16% down on its low of $15.60 on 9 March 2009. Sure, the Aussie dollar has rallied substantially. And US and European interest rates look like they’ll be low for a very long time (a large part of QBE’s profit has historically come from investing premiums and its own shareholders’ funds in highly rated debt securities).
At today’s price, though, you don’t need them to earn any return on their investments. The underwriting profit alone should be more than $1.4bn and the current market capitalisation is only 10 times that. In other words, this business should give you a pre-tax return of 10% without any return on investments and without any growth.
Those are not just conservative assumptions. They are absurd. For mine, buying QBE today is a simple decision. Working out whether GPT was going to survive was not.
PS. As an aside, low investment returns and high underwriting profits should go hand in hand. Back when interest rates were 10%, insurers could write policies at a combined operating ratio of 105 – an underwriting loss of 5% – and still make a profit thanks to the investment returns. Now that investment returns are so low, the industry needs to write policies at prices that produce an underwriting profit.
Functional cookies Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.